appaman vs SoftFrame Designs: which affiliate program pays better?
Two sustainable & eco-friendly programs ranked next to each other on Affiliate Graph, compared on the public terms their networks list. appaman lists the higher top commission (2%–8% against 3%). Neither program publishes a cookie window in its network listing. They share 2 networks (Connexity, Impact), so one publisher account can carry both. Both hold an Affiliate Graph Rank score of 96/100 in Sustainable & Eco-Friendly.
| Term |  appaman |  SoftFrame Designs |
|---|---|---|
| Listed commission | 2%–8% | 3% |
| Cookie window | Not published | Not published |
| Networks | 6: Connexity, Digidip, Flexoffers, Impact, Loyalize, Skimlinks | 2: Connexity, Impact |
| Direct networks | Impact | Impact |
| Rank score | 96/100 | 96/100 |
| Rank basis | observed commission | observed commission |
| Brand size | — | Large |
| Categories | Sustainable & Eco-Friendly, Clothing & Fashion, Baby & Toddler, Gifts | Home & Garden, Sustainable & Eco-Friendly, Gifts, Digital Services & Software |
| Markets | US | US |
| Status | Active | Active |
Choose appaman for
- the higher listed commission (2%–8%)
- more ways to join (6 networks)
Choose SoftFrame Designs for
Fit with your audience: on the listed terms appaman has the edge, and SoftFrame Designs is the better choice where its products match what you cover.
SoftFrame Designs program detailsWhere to join
Both programs are listed on Connexity, Impact. appaman is also on Digidip, Flexoffers, Loyalize, Skimlinks.
Compared on listed program terms from the networks' public listings. Rates and cookies change; confirm current terms on the network before applying. The rank score is a position among tracked US and UK brands, indexed 0 to 100; the underlying figures are not published. Methodology · Data updated Oct 23, 2026.