Checkr vs Grasshopper: which affiliate program pays better?
Two business programs ranked next to each other on Affiliate Graph, compared on the public terms their networks list. Grasshopper lists the higher top commission (2%–47.8% against 16.100000381469727%–25%). Neither program publishes a cookie window in its network listing. They share 3 networks (Digidip, Flexoffers, Impact), so one publisher account can carry both. Both hold an Affiliate Graph Rank score of 91/100 in Business.
| Term |  Checkr |  Grasshopper |
|---|---|---|
| Listed commission | 16.100000381469727%–25% | 2%–47.8% |
| Cookie window | Not published | Not published |
| Networks | 4: Digidip, Flexoffers, Impact, Skimlinks | 5: Connexity, Digidip, Flexoffers, Impact, Loyalize |
| Direct networks | Impact | Impact |
| Rank score | 91/100 | 91/100 |
| Rank basis | observed commission | observed commission |
| Brand size | Mid-size | — |
| Categories | Business, Digital Services & Software | Digital Services & Software, Business, Subscription Box |
| Markets | US | US |
| Status | Active | Active |
Choose Checkr for
Fit with your audience: on the listed terms Grasshopper has the edge, and Checkr is the better choice where its products match what you cover.
Checkr program detailsChoose Grasshopper for
- the higher listed commission (2%–47.8%)
- more ways to join (5 networks)
Where to join
Both programs are listed on Digidip, Flexoffers, Impact. Checkr is also on Skimlinks. Grasshopper is also on Connexity, Loyalize.
Compared on listed program terms from the networks' public listings. Rates and cookies change; confirm current terms on the network before applying. The rank score is a position among tracked US and UK brands, indexed 0 to 100; the underlying figures are not published. Methodology · Data updated Oct 23, 2026.