Children of Design vs eBrands: which affiliate program pays better?
Two baby & toddler programs ranked next to each other on Affiliate Graph, compared on the public terms their networks list. eBrands lists the higher top commission (8%–20% against 10%). Neither program publishes a cookie window in its network listing. They run on different networks (Children of Design: Awin, Digidip; eBrands: Impact). Both hold an Affiliate Graph Rank score of 61/100 in Baby & Toddler.
| Term |  Children of Design |  eBrands |
|---|---|---|
| Listed commission | 10% | 8%–20% |
| Cookie window | Not published | Not published |
| Networks | 2: Awin, Digidip | 1: Impact |
| Direct networks | Awin | Impact |
| Rank score | 61/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank basis | web traffic | web traffic |
| Brand size | Emerging | Emerging |
| Categories | Baby & Toddler, Home & Garden | Business, Digital Services & Software, Baby & Toddler, Health & Wellness |
| Markets | US | US, CA, UK |
| Status | Active | Active |
Where to join
Children of Design is also on Awin, Digidip. eBrands is also on Impact.
Compared on listed program terms from the networks' public listings. Rates and cookies change; confirm current terms on the network before applying. The rank score is a position among tracked US and UK brands, indexed 0 to 100; the underlying figures are not published. Methodology · Data updated Oct 23, 2026.