Clutter vs Tanga: which affiliate program pays better?
Two home & garden programs ranked next to each other on Affiliate Graph, compared on the public terms their networks list. Clutter lists the higher top commission (5%–50% against 5%–20%). Neither program publishes a cookie window in its network listing. They share 4 networks (Digidip, Flexoffers, Impact, Loyalize), so one publisher account can carry both. Both hold an Affiliate Graph Rank score of 98/100 in Home & Garden.
| Term |  Clutter |  Tanga |
|---|---|---|
| Listed commission | 5%–50% | 5%–20% |
| Cookie window | Not published | Not published |
| Networks | 6: Digidip, Flexoffers, Impact, Loyalize, Siteplug, Skimlinks | 6: CJ, Connexity, Digidip, Flexoffers, Impact, Loyalize |
| Direct networks | Impact | CJ, Impact |
| Rank score | 98/100 | 98/100 |
| Rank basis | observed commission | observed commission |
| Brand size | — | Mid-size |
| Categories | Home & Garden, Travel, Business, Digital Services & Software | Electronics, Gifts, Home & Garden, Clothing & Fashion |
| Markets | US | US |
| Status | Active | Active |
Choose Tanga for
Fit with your audience: on the listed terms Clutter has the edge, and Tanga is the better choice where its products match what you cover.
Tanga program detailsWhere to join
Both programs are listed on Digidip, Flexoffers, Impact, Loyalize. Clutter is also on Siteplug, Skimlinks. Tanga is also on CJ, Connexity.
Compared on listed program terms from the networks' public listings. Rates and cookies change; confirm current terms on the network before applying. The rank score is a position among tracked US and UK brands, indexed 0 to 100; the underlying figures are not published. Methodology · Data updated Oct 23, 2026.