Conde Nast vs ProLon (US): which affiliate program pays better?
Two food & drink programs ranked next to each other on Affiliate Graph, compared on the public terms their networks list. ProLon (US) lists the higher top commission (7.5%–20% against 0.8%–12.5%). Neither program publishes a cookie window in its network listing. They share a network (Impact), so one publisher account can carry both. Both hold an Affiliate Graph Rank score of 99/100 in Food & Drink.
| Term |  Conde Nast |  ProLon (US) |
|---|---|---|
| Listed commission | 0.8%–12.5% | 7.5%–20% |
| Cookie window | Not published | Not published |
| Networks | 2: Digidip, Impact | 5: CJ, Connexity, Impact, Loyalize, Skimlinks |
| Direct networks | Impact | CJ, Impact |
| Rank score | 99/100 | 99/100 |
| Rank basis | observed commission | observed commission |
| Brand size | Small | Large |
| Categories | Food & Drink, Entertainment, Subscription Box, Beauty & Personal Care | Health & Wellness, Beauty & Personal Care, Food & Drink, Subscription Box |
| Markets | US, PR | US |
| Status | Active | Active |
Choose Conde Nast for
Fit with your audience: on the listed terms ProLon (US) has the edge, and Conde Nast is the better choice where its products match what you cover.
Conde Nast program detailsChoose ProLon (US) for
- the higher listed commission (7.5%–20%)
- more ways to join (5 networks)
Where to join
Both programs are listed on Impact. Conde Nast is also on Digidip. ProLon (US) is also on CJ, Connexity, Loyalize, Skimlinks.
Compared on listed program terms from the networks' public listings. Rates and cookies change; confirm current terms on the network before applying. The rank score is a position among tracked US and UK brands, indexed 0 to 100; the underlying figures are not published. Methodology · Data updated Oct 23, 2026.