Eat Clean vs Uber Eats: which affiliate program pays better?
Two food & drink programs ranked next to each other on Affiliate Graph, compared on the public terms their networks list. Uber Eats lists the higher top commission (1.4%–72.7% against 0.5566%–30%). Neither program publishes a cookie window in its network listing. They share a network (Impact), so one publisher account can carry both. Both hold an Affiliate Graph Rank score of 100/100 in Food & Drink.
| Term |  Eat Clean |  Uber Eats |
|---|---|---|
| Listed commission | 0.5566%–30% | 1.4%–72.7% |
| Cookie window | Not published | Not published |
| Networks | 3: Impact, Pepperjam, Skimlinks | 2: Digidip, Impact |
| Direct networks | Impact, Pepperjam | Impact |
| Rank score | 100/100 | 100/100 |
| Rank basis | observed commission | observed commission |
| Brand size | — | — |
| Categories | Food & Drink, Subscription Box, Beauty & Personal Care, Health & Wellness | Food & Drink, Digital Services & Software, Travel, Subscription Box |
| Markets | US | US |
| Status | Active | Active |
Where to join
Both programs are listed on Impact. Eat Clean is also on Pepperjam, Skimlinks. Uber Eats is also on Digidip.
Compared on listed program terms from the networks' public listings. Rates and cookies change; confirm current terms on the network before applying. The rank score is a position among tracked US and UK brands, indexed 0 to 100; the underlying figures are not published. Methodology · Data updated Oct 23, 2026.