eBags vs Suiteness: which affiliate program pays better?
Two travel programs ranked next to each other on Affiliate Graph, compared on the public terms their networks list. eBags lists the higher top commission (2.1%–3% against 2%). Neither program publishes a cookie window in its network listing. They run on different networks (eBags: Impact, Skimlinks, Sovrn; Suiteness: Flexoffers, Rakuten). Both hold an Affiliate Graph Rank score of 86/100 in Travel.
| Term | ||
|---|---|---|
| Listed commission | 2.1%–3% | 2% |
| Cookie window | Not published | Not published |
| Networks | 3: Impact, Skimlinks, Sovrn | 2: Flexoffers, Rakuten |
| Direct networks | Impact | Rakuten |
| Rank score | 86/100 | 86/100 |
| Rank basis | web traffic | web traffic |
| Brand size | Large | Large |
| Categories | Travel, Accessories, Business, Clothing & Fashion | Travel, Entertainment |
| Markets | US | US, CA, UK, AU, JP, AF, AL, DZ, AS, AD, AI, AQ |
| Status | Active | Active |
Choose eBags for
- the higher listed commission (2.1%–3%)
- more ways to join (3 networks)
Choose Suiteness for
Fit with your audience: on the listed terms eBags has the edge, and Suiteness is the better choice where its products match what you cover.
Suiteness program detailsWhere to join
eBags is also on Impact, Skimlinks, Sovrn. Suiteness is also on Flexoffers, Rakuten.
Compared on listed program terms from the networks' public listings. Rates and cookies change; confirm current terms on the network before applying. The rank score is a position among tracked US and UK brands, indexed 0 to 100; the underlying figures are not published. Methodology · Data updated Oct 23, 2026.