FMS vs Oshkosh: which affiliate program pays better?
Two toys & games programs ranked next to each other on Affiliate Graph, compared on the public terms their networks list. FMS lists the higher top commission (5% against 3%). Neither program publishes a cookie window in its network listing. They share a network (Impact), so one publisher account can carry both. Both hold an Affiliate Graph Rank score of 86/100 in Toys & Games.
| Term |  FMS |  Oshkosh |
|---|---|---|
| Listed commission | 5% | 3% |
| Cookie window | Not published | Not published |
| Networks | 3: Digidip, Flexoffers, Impact | 2: Impact, Siteplug |
| Direct networks | Impact | Impact |
| Rank score | 86/100 | 86/100 |
| Rank basis | web traffic | web traffic |
| Brand size | Large | Large |
| Categories | Toys & Games, Accessories, Electronics, Sports & Outdoors | Clothing & Fashion, Baby & Toddler, Shoes, Toys & Games |
| Markets | US, AU, CA, UK | US |
| Status | Active | Active |
Choose Oshkosh for
Fit with your audience: on the listed terms FMS has the edge, and Oshkosh is the better choice where its products match what you cover.
Oshkosh program detailsWhere to join
Both programs are listed on Impact. FMS is also on Digidip, Flexoffers. Oshkosh is also on Siteplug.
Compared on listed program terms from the networks' public listings. Rates and cookies change; confirm current terms on the network before applying. The rank score is a position among tracked US and UK brands, indexed 0 to 100; the underlying figures are not published. Methodology · Data updated Oct 23, 2026.