Skip to content

Hostinger vs Ottocast: which affiliate program pays better?

Two digital services & software programs ranked next to each other on Affiliate Graph, compared on the public terms their networks list. Hostinger lists the higher top commission (7%–48% against 5%–35%). Neither program publishes a cookie window in its network listing. They share 7 networks (Awin, Connexity, Digidip, Flexoffers, Impact, Loyalize, Skimlinks), so one publisher account can carry both. Both hold an Affiliate Graph Rank score of 98/100 in Digital Services & Software.

TermHostingerOttocast
Listed commission7%–48%5%–35%
Cookie windowNot publishedNot published
Networks10: Awin, CJ, Connexity, Digidip, Flexoffers, Impact, Loyalize, Siteplug, Skimlinks, Tradedoubler7: Awin, Connexity, Digidip, Flexoffers, Impact, Loyalize, Skimlinks
Direct networksAwin, CJ, Impact, TradedoublerAwin, Impact
Rank score98/10098/100
Rank basisobserved commissionobserved commission
Brand size—Mid-size
CategoriesDigital Services & Software, Business, Subscription BoxAuto & Tires, Electronics, Digital Services & Software, Gifts
MarketsUS, UK, CA, AU, IN, BR, SG, ID, MY, PH, DE, FRUS, UK, SE, DK
StatusActiveActive

Choose Hostinger for

  • the higher listed commission (7%–48%)
  • more ways to join (10 networks)
Hostinger program details

Choose Ottocast for

Fit with your audience: on the listed terms Hostinger has the edge, and Ottocast is the better choice where its products match what you cover.

Ottocast program details

Where to join

Both programs are listed on Awin, Connexity, Digidip, Flexoffers, Impact, Loyalize, Skimlinks. Hostinger is also on CJ, Siteplug, Tradedoubler.

Compared on listed program terms from the networks' public listings. Rates and cookies change; confirm current terms on the network before applying. The rank score is a position among tracked US and UK brands, indexed 0 to 100; the underlying figures are not published. Methodology · Data updated Oct 23, 2026.

More comparisons

All digital services & software affiliate programs, ranked