Hubble Contacts vs MELT Method: which affiliate program pays better?
Two beauty & personal care programs ranked next to each other on Affiliate Graph, compared on the public terms their networks list. Hubble Contacts lists the higher top commission (5%–25% against 8%–10%). Neither program publishes a cookie window in its network listing. They share 6 networks (Awin, Connexity, Digidip, Flexoffers, Loyalize, Skimlinks), so one publisher account can carry both. Both hold an Affiliate Graph Rank score of 99/100 in Beauty & Personal Care.
| Term |  Hubble Contacts |  MELT Method |
|---|---|---|
| Listed commission | 5%–25% | 8%–10% |
| Cookie window | Not published | Not published |
| Networks | 6: Awin, Connexity, Digidip, Flexoffers, Loyalize, Skimlinks | 6: Awin, Connexity, Digidip, Flexoffers, Loyalize, Skimlinks |
| Direct networks | Awin | Awin |
| Rank score | 99/100 | 99/100 |
| Rank basis | observed commission | observed commission |
| Brand size | Large | Mid-size |
| Categories | Beauty & Personal Care, Subscription Box, Health & Wellness, Digital Services & Software | Sports & Outdoors, Beauty & Personal Care, Subscription Box, Digital Services & Software |
| Markets | US | US, CA |
| Status | Active | Active |
Choose MELT Method for
Fit with your audience: on the listed terms Hubble Contacts has the edge, and MELT Method is the better choice where its products match what you cover.
MELT Method program detailsCompared on listed program terms from the networks' public listings. Rates and cookies change; confirm current terms on the network before applying. The rank score is a position among tracked US and UK brands, indexed 0 to 100; the underlying figures are not published. Methodology · Data updated Oct 23, 2026.