Hunter Boots vs Bealls Florida: which affiliate program pays better?
Two clothing & fashion programs ranked next to each other on Affiliate Graph, compared on the public terms their networks list. Hunter Boots lists the higher top commission (3%–15% against 6%–10%). Neither program publishes a cookie window in its network listing. They share 4 networks (Connexity, Digidip, Flexoffers, Skimlinks), so one publisher account can carry both. Both hold an Affiliate Graph Rank score of 98/100 in Clothing & Fashion.
| Term |  Hunter Boots |  Bealls Florida |
|---|---|---|
| Listed commission | 3%–15% | 6%–10% |
| Cookie window | Not published | Not published |
| Networks | 6: CJ, Connexity, Digidip, Flexoffers, Siteplug, Skimlinks | 5: Connexity, Digidip, Flexoffers, Pepperjam, Skimlinks |
| Direct networks | CJ | Pepperjam |
| Rank score | 98/100 | 98/100 |
| Rank basis | observed commission | observed commission |
| Brand size | Large | Large |
| Categories | Clothing & Fashion, Shoes, Sports & Outdoors, Accessories | Clothing & Fashion, Home & Garden, Shoes, Accessories |
| Markets | US, CA, AU, DE, FR, IT, ES, JP, UK | US |
| Status | Active | Active |
Choose Hunter Boots for
- the higher listed commission (3%–15%)
- more ways to join (6 networks)
Choose Bealls Florida for
Fit with your audience: on the listed terms Hunter Boots has the edge, and Bealls Florida is the better choice where its products match what you cover.
Bealls Florida program detailsWhere to join
Both programs are listed on Connexity, Digidip, Flexoffers, Skimlinks. Hunter Boots is also on CJ, Siteplug. Bealls Florida is also on Pepperjam.
Compared on listed program terms from the networks' public listings. Rates and cookies change; confirm current terms on the network before applying. The rank score is a position among tracked US and UK brands, indexed 0 to 100; the underlying figures are not published. Methodology · Data updated Oct 23, 2026.