Kate Somerville vs Molecular Hydrogen Technologies: which affiliate program pays better?
Two beauty & personal care programs ranked next to each other on Affiliate Graph, compared on the public terms their networks list. Molecular Hydrogen Technologies lists the higher top commission (2%–10% against 1%). Neither program publishes a cookie window in its network listing. They share 3 networks (Digidip, Flexoffers, Skimlinks), so one publisher account can carry both. Both hold an Affiliate Graph Rank score of 97/100 in Beauty & Personal Care.
| Term |  Kate Somerville |  Molecular Hydrogen Technologies |
|---|---|---|
| Listed commission | 1% | 2%–10% |
| Cookie window | Not published | Not published |
| Networks | 5: Connexity, Digidip, Flexoffers, Pepperjam, Skimlinks | 5: Awin, Digidip, Flexoffers, Loyalize, Skimlinks |
| Direct networks | Pepperjam | Awin |
| Rank score | 97/100 | 97/100 |
| Rank basis | observed commission | observed commission |
| Brand size | Large | Small |
| Categories | Beauty & Personal Care | Beauty & Personal Care, Home & Garden, Subscription Box, Sports & Outdoors |
| Markets | US, CA | US |
| Status | Active | Active |
Choose Kate Somerville for
Fit with your audience: on the listed terms Molecular Hydrogen Technologies has the edge, and Kate Somerville is the better choice where its products match what you cover.
Kate Somerville program detailsChoose Molecular Hydrogen Technologies for
- the higher listed commission (2%–10%)
Where to join
Both programs are listed on Digidip, Flexoffers, Skimlinks. Kate Somerville is also on Connexity, Pepperjam. Molecular Hydrogen Technologies is also on Awin, Loyalize.
Compared on listed program terms from the networks' public listings. Rates and cookies change; confirm current terms on the network before applying. The rank score is a position among tracked US and UK brands, indexed 0 to 100; the underlying figures are not published. Methodology · Data updated Oct 23, 2026.