Pethonesty vs Gunner: which affiliate program pays better?
Two pet programs ranked next to each other on Affiliate Graph, compared on the public terms their networks list. Pethonesty lists the higher top commission (8%–20% against 10%). Neither program publishes a cookie window in its network listing. They run on different networks (Pethonesty: Flexoffers, Pepperjam, Skimlinks, Sovrn; Gunner: Impact). Both hold an Affiliate Graph Rank score of 86/100 in Pet.
| Term |  Pethonesty |  Gunner |
|---|---|---|
| Listed commission | 8%–20% | 10% |
| Cookie window | Not published | Not published |
| Networks | 4: Flexoffers, Pepperjam, Skimlinks, Sovrn | 1: Impact |
| Direct networks | Pepperjam | Impact |
| Rank score | 86/100 | 86/100 |
| Rank basis | web traffic | web traffic |
| Brand size | Large | Large |
| Categories | Pet, Health & Wellness, Subscription Box | Pet, Accessories, Home & Garden |
| Markets | US, CA | US |
| Status | Active | Active |
Choose Pethonesty for
- the higher listed commission (8%–20%)
- more ways to join (4 networks)
Choose Gunner for
Fit with your audience: on the listed terms Pethonesty has the edge, and Gunner is the better choice where its products match what you cover.
Gunner program detailsWhere to join
Pethonesty is also on Flexoffers, Pepperjam, Skimlinks, Sovrn. Gunner is also on Impact.
Compared on listed program terms from the networks' public listings. Rates and cookies change; confirm current terms on the network before applying. The rank score is a position among tracked US and UK brands, indexed 0 to 100; the underlying figures are not published. Methodology · Data updated Oct 23, 2026.