Skip to content

QuickBooks vs Norton: which affiliate program pays better?

Two business programs ranked next to each other on Affiliate Graph, compared on the public terms their networks list. Norton lists the higher top commission (6.7%–35% against 20%). Neither program publishes a cookie window in its network listing. They share 3 networks (CJ, Flexoffers, Skimlinks), so one publisher account can carry both. Both hold an Affiliate Graph Rank score of 96/100 in Business.

TermQuickBooksNorton
Listed commission20%6.7%–35%
Cookie windowNot publishedNot published
Networks4: CJ, Flexoffers, PartnerStack, Skimlinks9: CJ, Connexity, Digidip, Flexoffers, Impact, Loyalize, Rakuten, Siteplug, Skimlinks
Direct networksCJ, PartnerStackCJ, Impact, Rakuten
Rank score96/10096/100
Rank basisobserved commissionobserved commission
Brand size——
CategoriesBusiness, Digital Services & Software, Finance, Subscription BoxDigital Services & Software, Business, Electronics, Subscription Box
MarketsUS, CA, UKUK, AU, NZ, SG, IN, JP, KR, MY, PH, ID, AR, BR
StatusActiveActive

Choose QuickBooks for

Fit with your audience: on the listed terms Norton has the edge, and QuickBooks is the better choice where its products match what you cover.

QuickBooks program details

Choose Norton for

  • the higher listed commission (6.7%–35%)
  • more ways to join (9 networks)
Norton program details

Where to join

Both programs are listed on CJ, Flexoffers, Skimlinks. QuickBooks is also on PartnerStack. Norton is also on Connexity, Digidip, Impact, Loyalize, Rakuten, Siteplug.

Compared on listed program terms from the networks' public listings. Rates and cookies change; confirm current terms on the network before applying. The rank score is a position among tracked US and UK brands, indexed 0 to 100; the underlying figures are not published. Methodology · Data updated Oct 23, 2026.

More comparisons

All business affiliate programs, ranked