Skip to content

Restaurant.com vs Marks and Spencer: which affiliate program pays better?

Two food & drink programs ranked next to each other on Affiliate Graph, compared on the public terms their networks list. Restaurant.com lists the higher top commission (14%–35% against 0.4000000059604645%–15%). Neither program publishes a cookie window in its network listing. They share 6 networks (Connexity, Digidip, Flexoffers, Impact, Loyalize, Skimlinks), so one publisher account can carry both. Both hold an Affiliate Graph Rank score of 90/100 in Food & Drink.

TermRestaurant.comMarks and Spencer
Listed commission14%–35%0.4000000059604645%–15%
Cookie windowNot publishedNot published
Networks7: Connexity, Digidip, Flexoffers, Impact, Loyalize, Siteplug, Skimlinks10: Awin, Connexity, Digidip, Flexoffers, Impact, Loyalize, Optimise, Skimlinks, Sovrn, Webgains
Direct networksImpactAwin, Impact, Optimise, Webgains
Rank score90/10090/100
Rank basisobserved commissionobserved commission
Brand sizeLargeVery large
CategoriesFood & Drink, Gifts, EntertainmentHome & Garden, Clothing & Fashion, Food & Drink, Accessories
MarketsUSUK, IE, CA, AU, US, FR, DE, NZ, ES, NL, BE, LU
StatusActiveActive

Choose Restaurant.com for

  • the higher listed commission (14%–35%)
Restaurant.com program details

Choose Marks and Spencer for

  • more ways to join (10 networks)
Marks and Spencer program details

Where to join

Both programs are listed on Connexity, Digidip, Flexoffers, Impact, Loyalize, Skimlinks. Restaurant.com is also on Siteplug. Marks and Spencer is also on Awin, Optimise, Sovrn, Webgains.

Compared on listed program terms from the networks' public listings. Rates and cookies change; confirm current terms on the network before applying. The rank score is a position among tracked US and UK brands, indexed 0 to 100; the underlying figures are not published. Methodology · Data updated Oct 23, 2026.

More comparisons

All food & drink affiliate programs, ranked