Roots by GA vs iRestore: which affiliate program pays better?
Two beauty & personal care programs ranked next to each other on Affiliate Graph, compared on the public terms their networks list. iRestore lists the higher top commission (10% against 3.86%). Neither program publishes a cookie window in its network listing. They share a network (Impact), so one publisher account can carry both. Both hold an Affiliate Graph Rank score of 98/100 in Beauty & Personal Care.
| Term |  Roots by GA |  iRestore |
|---|---|---|
| Listed commission | 3.86% | 10% |
| Cookie window | Not published | Not published |
| Networks | 3: Digidip, Impact, Skimlinks | 3: Connexity, Flexoffers, Impact |
| Direct networks | Impact | Impact |
| Rank score | 98/100 | 98/100 |
| Rank basis | observed commission | observed commission |
| Brand size | — | Mid-size |
| Categories | Beauty & Personal Care, Subscription Box, Gifts, Home & Garden | Beauty & Personal Care, Digital Services & Software |
| Markets | US | US, CA, UK, AU |
| Status | Active | Active |
Choose Roots by GA for
Fit with your audience: on the listed terms iRestore has the edge, and Roots by GA is the better choice where its products match what you cover.
Roots by GA program detailsWhere to join
Both programs are listed on Impact. Roots by GA is also on Digidip, Skimlinks. iRestore is also on Connexity, Flexoffers.
Compared on listed program terms from the networks' public listings. Rates and cookies change; confirm current terms on the network before applying. The rank score is a position among tracked US and UK brands, indexed 0 to 100; the underlying figures are not published. Methodology · Data updated Oct 23, 2026.