Rugs (US) vs Philips: which affiliate program pays better?
Two home & garden programs ranked next to each other on Affiliate Graph, compared on the public terms their networks list. Rugs (US) lists the higher top commission (1%–8% against 4%). Neither program publishes a cookie window in its network listing. They run on different networks (Rugs (US): Connexity, Digidip, Flexoffers, Impact, Loyalize, Skimlinks, Sovrn; Philips: CJ, Partnerize, Tradedoubler). Both hold an Affiliate Graph Rank score of 100/100 in Home & Garden.
| Term |  Rugs (US) |  Philips |
|---|---|---|
| Listed commission | 1%–8% | 4% |
| Cookie window | Not published | Not published |
| Networks | 7: Connexity, Digidip, Flexoffers, Impact, Loyalize, Skimlinks, Sovrn | 3: CJ, Partnerize, Tradedoubler |
| Direct networks | Impact | CJ, Partnerize, Tradedoubler |
| Rank score | 100/100 | 100/100 |
| Rank basis | observed commission | observed commission |
| Brand size | Very large | Very large |
| Categories | Home & Garden, Gifts, Sports & Outdoors | Electronics, Home & Garden, Beauty & Personal Care, Digital Services & Software |
| Markets | US, CA | US, FR, NL, BE, IT, CA, BR, CH, AT, PL |
| Status | Active | Active |
Choose Rugs (US) for
- the higher listed commission (1%–8%)
- more ways to join (7 networks)
Choose Philips for
Fit with your audience: on the listed terms Rugs (US) has the edge, and Philips is the better choice where its products match what you cover.
Philips program detailsWhere to join
Rugs (US) is also on Connexity, Digidip, Flexoffers, Impact, Loyalize, Skimlinks, Sovrn. Philips is also on CJ, Partnerize, Tradedoubler.
Compared on listed program terms from the networks' public listings. Rates and cookies change; confirm current terms on the network before applying. The rank score is a position among tracked US and UK brands, indexed 0 to 100; the underlying figures are not published. Methodology · Data updated Oct 23, 2026.