SeaWorld Parks (US) vs ALPAKA: which affiliate program pays better?
Two travel programs ranked next to each other on Affiliate Graph, compared on the public terms their networks list. ALPAKA lists the higher top commission (4%–8% against 1%). Neither program publishes a cookie window in its network listing. They run on different networks (SeaWorld Parks (US): CJ; ALPAKA: Avantlink, Connexity, Flexoffers, Loyalize, Skimlinks). Both hold an Affiliate Graph Rank score of 98/100 in Travel.
| Term |  SeaWorld Parks (US) |  ALPAKA |
|---|---|---|
| Listed commission | 1% | 4%–8% |
| Cookie window | Not published | Not published |
| Networks | 1: CJ | 5: Avantlink, Connexity, Flexoffers, Loyalize, Skimlinks |
| Direct networks | CJ | Avantlink |
| Rank score | 98/100 | 98/100 |
| Rank basis | observed commission | observed commission |
| Brand size | Large | Mid-size |
| Categories | Travel, Entertainment, Sports & Outdoors | Sports & Outdoors, Travel, Clothing & Fashion, Accessories |
| Markets | US | US, CA, AU, DE, UK, SG, FR |
| Status | Active | Active |
Choose SeaWorld Parks (US) for
Fit with your audience: on the listed terms ALPAKA has the edge, and SeaWorld Parks (US) is the better choice where its products match what you cover.
SeaWorld Parks (US) program detailsChoose ALPAKA for
- the higher listed commission (4%–8%)
- more ways to join (5 networks)
Where to join
SeaWorld Parks (US) is also on CJ. ALPAKA is also on Avantlink, Connexity, Flexoffers, Loyalize, Skimlinks.
Compared on listed program terms from the networks' public listings. Rates and cookies change; confirm current terms on the network before applying. The rank score is a position among tracked US and UK brands, indexed 0 to 100; the underlying figures are not published. Methodology · Data updated Oct 23, 2026.