SelfDecode vs FICO: which affiliate program pays better?
Two digital services & software programs ranked next to each other on Affiliate Graph, compared on the public terms their networks list. FICO lists the higher top commission (20%–57.18% against 15%). Neither program publishes a cookie window in its network listing. They run on different networks (SelfDecode: Flexoffers; FICO: Rakuten, Skimlinks). Both hold an Affiliate Graph Rank score of 95/100 in Digital Services & Software.
| Term |  SelfDecode |  FICO |
|---|---|---|
| Listed commission | 15% | 20%–57.18% |
| Cookie window | Not published | Not published |
| Networks | 1: Flexoffers | 2: Rakuten, Skimlinks |
| Direct networks | None | Rakuten |
| Rank score | 95/100 | 95/100 |
| Rank basis | observed commission | observed commission |
| Brand size | Mid-size | — |
| Categories | Digital Services & Software, Subscription Box, Health & Wellness | Finance, Digital Services & Software |
| Markets | US | US |
| Status | Active | Active |
Choose SelfDecode for
Fit with your audience: on the listed terms FICO has the edge, and SelfDecode is the better choice where its products match what you cover.
SelfDecode program detailsChoose FICO for
- the higher listed commission (20%–57.18%)
- more ways to join (2 networks)
- a direct network program rather than sub-affiliate only
Where to join
SelfDecode is also on Flexoffers. FICO is also on Rakuten, Skimlinks.
Compared on listed program terms from the networks' public listings. Rates and cookies change; confirm current terms on the network before applying. The rank score is a position among tracked US and UK brands, indexed 0 to 100; the underlying figures are not published. Methodology · Data updated Oct 23, 2026.