Skip to content

Skechers (UK) vs Shoebacca: which affiliate program pays better?

Two shoes programs ranked next to each other on Affiliate Graph, compared on the public terms their networks list. Shoebacca lists the higher top commission (1.6%–10% against 6%). Neither program publishes a cookie window in its network listing. They share 2 networks (Connexity, Skimlinks), so one publisher account can carry both. Both hold an Affiliate Graph Rank score of 96/100 in Shoes.

TermSkechers (UK)Shoebacca
Listed commission6%1.6%–10%
Cookie windowNot publishedNot published
Networks4: CJ, Connexity, Skimlinks, Webgains8: Connexity, Digidip, Flexoffers, Impact, Loyalize, Siteplug, Skimlinks, Sovrn
Direct networksCJ, WebgainsImpact
Rank score96/10096/100
Rank basisobserved commissionobserved commission
Brand sizeVery largeLarge
CategoriesShoes, Clothing & Fashion, Sports & Outdoors, AccessoriesShoes, Clothing & Fashion, Accessories, Sports & Outdoors
MarketsDE, ES, NL, FR, PL, IT, BE, IE, CZ, AT, CH, HUUS, CA
StatusActiveActive

Choose Skechers (UK) for

Fit with your audience: on the listed terms Shoebacca has the edge, and Skechers (UK) is the better choice where its products match what you cover.

Skechers (UK) program details

Choose Shoebacca for

  • the higher listed commission (1.6%–10%)
  • more ways to join (8 networks)
Shoebacca program details

Where to join

Both programs are listed on Connexity, Skimlinks. Skechers (UK) is also on CJ, Webgains. Shoebacca is also on Digidip, Flexoffers, Impact, Loyalize, Siteplug, Sovrn.

Compared on listed program terms from the networks' public listings. Rates and cookies change; confirm current terms on the network before applying. The rank score is a position among tracked US and UK brands, indexed 0 to 100; the underlying figures are not published. Methodology · Data updated Oct 23, 2026.

More comparisons

All shoes affiliate programs, ranked