SuckerPunch vs Tailwind Nutrition: which affiliate program pays better?
Two food & drink programs ranked next to each other on Affiliate Graph, compared on the public terms their networks list. Both list a top commission of 10%. Neither program publishes a cookie window in its network listing. They share a network (Connexity), so one publisher account can carry both. Both hold an Affiliate Graph Rank score of 95/100 in Food & Drink.
| Term |  SuckerPunch |  Tailwind Nutrition |
|---|---|---|
| Listed commission | 4%–10% | 10% |
| Cookie window | Not published | Not published |
| Networks | 2: Connexity, Impact | 3: Avantlink, Connexity, Skimlinks |
| Direct networks | Impact | Avantlink |
| Rank score | 95/100 | 95/100 |
| Rank basis | observed commission | observed commission |
| Brand size | Mid-size | Mid-size |
| Categories | Food & Drink | Sports & Outdoors, Food & Drink, Subscription Box, Health & Wellness |
| Markets | US | US, CA, AU, UK |
| Status | Active | Active |
Choose SuckerPunch for
Fit with your audience: on the listed terms Tailwind Nutrition has the edge, and SuckerPunch is the better choice where its products match what you cover.
SuckerPunch program detailsWhere to join
Both programs are listed on Connexity. SuckerPunch is also on Impact. Tailwind Nutrition is also on Avantlink, Skimlinks.
Compared on listed program terms from the networks' public listings. Rates and cookies change; confirm current terms on the network before applying. The rank score is a position among tracked US and UK brands, indexed 0 to 100; the underlying figures are not published. Methodology · Data updated Oct 23, 2026.