Total Wine vs Zuma Nutrition: which affiliate program pays better?
Two food & drink programs ranked next to each other on Affiliate Graph, compared on the public terms their networks list. Both list a top commission of 5%. Neither program publishes a cookie window in its network listing. They share 3 networks (Digidip, Flexoffers, Skimlinks), so one publisher account can carry both. Both hold an Affiliate Graph Rank score of 99/100 in Food & Drink.
| Term |  Total Wine |  Zuma Nutrition |
|---|---|---|
| Listed commission | 0.2%–5% | 5% |
| Cookie window | Not published | Not published |
| Networks | 4: Digidip, Flexoffers, Pepperjam, Skimlinks | 5: Connexity, Digidip, Flexoffers, Impact, Skimlinks |
| Direct networks | Pepperjam | Impact |
| Rank score | 99/100 | 99/100 |
| Rank basis | observed commission | observed commission |
| Brand size | Large | Small |
| Categories | Food & Drink, Gifts, Home & Garden, Subscription Box | Beauty & Personal Care, Health & Wellness, Subscription Box, Food & Drink |
| Markets | US | US |
| Status | Active | Active |
Choose Total Wine for
Fit with your audience: on the listed terms Zuma Nutrition has the edge, and Total Wine is the better choice where its products match what you cover.
Total Wine program detailsWhere to join
Both programs are listed on Digidip, Flexoffers, Skimlinks. Total Wine is also on Pepperjam. Zuma Nutrition is also on Connexity, Impact.
Compared on listed program terms from the networks' public listings. Rates and cookies change; confirm current terms on the network before applying. The rank score is a position among tracked US and UK brands, indexed 0 to 100; the underlying figures are not published. Methodology · Data updated Oct 23, 2026.