Waldencast vs Pvolve: which affiliate program pays better?
Two beauty & personal care programs ranked next to each other on Affiliate Graph, compared on the public terms their networks list. Pvolve lists the higher top commission (2%–10% against 4%–5%). Neither program publishes a cookie window in its network listing. They share a network (Impact), so one publisher account can carry both. Both hold an Affiliate Graph Rank score of 98/100 in Beauty & Personal Care.
| Term |  Waldencast |  Pvolve |
|---|---|---|
| Listed commission | 4%–5% | 2%–10% |
| Cookie window | Not published | Not published |
| Networks | 1: Impact | 4: Connexity, Flexoffers, Impact, Skimlinks |
| Direct networks | Impact | Impact |
| Rank score | 98/100 | 98/100 |
| Rank basis | observed commission | observed commission |
| Brand size | — | Large |
| Categories | Beauty & Personal Care, Gifts | Beauty & Personal Care, Sports & Outdoors, Subscription Box, Digital Services & Software |
| Markets | US, UK | US |
| Status | Active | Active |
Choose Waldencast for
Fit with your audience: on the listed terms Pvolve has the edge, and Waldencast is the better choice where its products match what you cover.
Waldencast program detailsChoose Pvolve for
- the higher listed commission (2%–10%)
- more ways to join (4 networks)
Where to join
Both programs are listed on Impact. Pvolve is also on Connexity, Flexoffers, Skimlinks.
Compared on listed program terms from the networks' public listings. Rates and cookies change; confirm current terms on the network before applying. The rank score is a position among tracked US and UK brands, indexed 0 to 100; the underlying figures are not published. Methodology · Data updated Oct 23, 2026.