White Fox Boutique vs Paw: which affiliate program pays better?
Two clothing & fashion programs ranked next to each other on Affiliate Graph, compared on the public terms their networks list. Paw lists the higher top commission (2%–10% against 2%–8%). Neither program publishes a cookie window in its network listing. They share 6 networks (Connexity, Digidip, Flexoffers, Loyalize, Rakuten, Skimlinks), so one publisher account can carry both. Both hold an Affiliate Graph Rank score of 98/100 in Clothing & Fashion.
| Term |  White Fox Boutique |  Paw |
|---|---|---|
| Listed commission | 2%–8% | 2%–10% |
| Cookie window | Not published | Not published |
| Networks | 6: Connexity, Digidip, Flexoffers, Loyalize, Rakuten, Skimlinks | 7: Connexity, Digidip, Flexoffers, Impact, Loyalize, Rakuten, Skimlinks |
| Direct networks | Rakuten | Impact, Rakuten |
| Rank score | 98/100 | 98/100 |
| Rank basis | observed commission | observed commission |
| Brand size | Large | Small |
| Categories | Clothing & Fashion, Accessories, Shoes, Beauty & Personal Care | Pet, Accessories, Home & Garden, Clothing & Fashion |
| Markets | US, CA, AU, DE, UK, FR, AT, ES, PT, HU, LU, CH | US, CA |
| Status | Active | Active |
Choose White Fox Boutique for
Fit with your audience: on the listed terms Paw has the edge, and White Fox Boutique is the better choice where its products match what you cover.
White Fox Boutique program detailsChoose Paw for
- the higher listed commission (2%–10%)
- more ways to join (7 networks)
Where to join
Both programs are listed on Connexity, Digidip, Flexoffers, Loyalize, Rakuten, Skimlinks. Paw is also on Impact.
Compared on listed program terms from the networks' public listings. Rates and cookies change; confirm current terms on the network before applying. The rank score is a position among tracked US and UK brands, indexed 0 to 100; the underlying figures are not published. Methodology · Data updated Oct 23, 2026.